OpenStreetMap ODbL acceptance and user ranks for the region of Ямало-Ненецкий автономный округ

If you want to ask a user about the ODbL:
  1. First check if the user hasn’t accepted already by clicking on the „H“ next to the username on this page (because this stats are only updated once a week) and if nobody else has bothered the user before (see the list in the wiki)
  2. check the OSM user page (click on the username on this page) and the wiki page of the user (click on the “W” next to the username on this page)
  3. do a web search on discussions of the user about the ODbL (click on the “S” next to the username on this page)
Please write a friendly mail, asking if the user already knows about the licence change, where he could read more about the topic and how he could accept the licence.

Created on: 2012-06-21, archive: 2012-05-15, 2012-03-28, 2012-03-15, 2012-02-29, 2012-02-14, 2012-01-30, 2012-01-16, 2011-12-28, 2011-12-15, 2011-11-23, 2011-11-09, 2011-10-25, 2011-10-13, 2011-09-27, 2011-09-13, 2011-09-06, 2011-08-30, 2011-08-23, 2011-08-16, 2011-08-10, 2011-07-27

Nodes
 ODbLCCODbL + CC
v1732 423 (88.56 %)2 116 (0.26 %)734 539 (88.82 %)
last edit92 206 (11.15 %)249 (0.03 %)92 455 (11.18 %)
v1 + last edit824 629 (99.71 %)2 365 (0.29 %)826 994 (100.00 %)
 
Ways
 ODbLCCODbL + CC
v121 149 (63.26 %)29 (0.09 %)21 178 (63.35 %)
last edit12 239 (36.61 %)15 (0.04 %)12 254 (36.65 %)
v1 + last edit33 388 (99.87 %)44 (0.13 %)33 432 (100.00 %)
 
Relations
 ODbLCCODbL + CC
v1928 (73.07 %) (0.00 %)928 (73.07 %)
last edit342 (26.93 %)0 (0.00 %)342 (26.93 %)
v1 + last edit1 270 (100.00 %)0 (0.00 %)1 270 (100.00 %)
 
Contributors
 242 (97.58 %)6 (2.42 %)248 (100.00 %)
Legend
X  
   
Y Z

The new ODbL database will contain at least X and at most Y objects of present state (if the database change would be today). At the moment the database contains a total of Z objects.

 

Rank¹
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
 
User²uidODbL³OSM merit⁴nodes⁵ways⁵relations⁵last edit
Total user/data ODbL acceptance rate (at last edit!):97.58% 99.71%99.87%100.00% 
NTKe368 1341197 489 (19.37 %)169 499 (20.50 %)5 418 (16.21 %)45 (3.54 %)2012-05-11
Cos234 3851136 729 (13.41 %)125 784 (15.21 %)2 177 (6.51 %)3 (0.24 %)2012-05-28
sim35 2471124 340 (12.20 %)120 250 (14.54 %)810 (2.42 %)2 (0.16 %)2010-05-08
fserges368 493171 727 (7.04 %)58 617 (7.09 %)2 562 (7.66 %)15 (1.18 %)2012-03-13
VitMar430 151136 810 (3.61 %)21 210 (2.56 %)3 120 (9.33 %) 2011-06-20
guanchzhou348 939136 417 (3.57 %)33 767 (4.08 %)530 (1.59 %) 2012-06-14
AMDmi3133 332132 988 (3.24 %)14 423 (1.74 %)3 205 (9.59 %)127 (10.00 %)2012-06-19
lurlrlrl534 149131 690 (3.11 %)26 910 (3.25 %)688 (2.06 %)67 (5.28 %)2012-06-15
kts282 856130 360 (2.98 %)23 060 (2.79 %)1 248 (3.73 %)53 (4.17 %)2012-05-10
ValentinAK313 053123 659 (2.32 %)21 524 (2.60 %)419 (1.25 %)2 (0.16 %)2012-04-16
physgeo92 561121 064 (2.07 %)15 004 (1.81 %)1 192 (3.57 %)5 (0.39 %)2011-10-30
Aleksandr Dezhin12 494120 685 (2.03 %)20 155 (2.44 %)70 (0.21 %)9 (0.71 %)2011-11-14
Elkim617 130114 523 (1.42 %)13 943 (1.69 %)112 (0.34 %)1 (0.08 %)2012-06-18
Sergey Astakhov143 266113 572 (1.33 %)8 242 (1.00 %)1 062 (3.18 %)1 (0.08 %)2012-05-18
MichaelCollinson308111 686 (1.15 %)11 686 (1.41 %)  2009-01-10
pta43493 976111 091 (1.09 %)9 306 (1.13 %)357 (1.07 %) 2012-05-26
Oksion60 769110 869 (1.07 %)5 944 (0.72 %)689 (2.06 %)74 (5.83 %)2012-05-03
neutron140 650110 246 (1.00 %)10 011 (1.21 %)47 (0.14 %) 2010-03-22
Droll-a411 28619 847 (0.97 %)6 532 (0.79 %)659 (1.97 %)1 (0.08 %)2012-04-18
katpatuka17 49719 790 (0.96 %)9 485 (1.15 %)53 (0.16 %)2 (0.16 %)2012-04-24
Danidin9395 58819 614 (0.94 %)6 429 (0.78 %)613 (1.83 %)6 (0.47 %)2012-01-24
Zverik290 27118 776 (0.86 %)4 221 (0.51 %)795 (2.38 %)29 (2.28 %)2012-01-30
dnikitin277 72617 836 (0.77 %)3 941 (0.48 %)775 (2.32 %)1 (0.08 %)2011-04-05
Dennis Apter180 46217 120 (0.70 %)  356 (28.03 %)2011-10-30
Marker13350 77616 598 (0.65 %)5 878 (0.71 %)144 (0.43 %) 2012-05-21
Сергей 1981601 13816 427 (0.63 %)3 252 (0.39 %)563 (1.68 %)18 (1.42 %)2012-04-29
Hind79 83615 416 (0.53 %)971 (0.12 %)265 (0.79 %)156 (12.28 %)2012-01-26
egorvan142 96515 405 (0.53 %)2 880 (0.35 %)505 (1.51 %) 2012-04-27
luiswoo311 31815 342 (0.52 %)2 952 (0.36 %)430 (1.29 %)12 (0.94 %)2012-02-18
ipodolsk16 31915 310 (0.52 %)5 180 (0.63 %)22 (0.07 %)1 (0.08 %)2010-01-24
evg794333 63915 166 (0.51 %)5 091 (0.62 %)15 (0.04 %) 2010-08-24
jstein31 31914 614 (0.45 %)3 974 (0.48 %)80 (0.24 %)12 (0.94 %)2011-05-28
FrankT29 01714 369 (0.43 %)3 464 (0.42 %)181 (0.54 %) 2011-12-06
old_Bibigon71 98114 066 (0.40 %)4 061 (0.49 %)1 (0.00 %) 2010-05-18
LexIgnatov316 86813 798 (0.37 %)2 223 (0.27 %)215 (0.64 %)25 (1.97 %)2012-05-22
one_half_354495 11713 747 (0.37 %)2 597 (0.31 %)222 (0.66 %)2 (0.16 %)2012-01-28
parukhin519 50113 580 (0.35 %)1 525 (0.18 %)387 (1.16 %)6 (0.47 %)2012-06-02
Проходимец152 44113 304 (0.32 %)2 614 (0.32 %)138 (0.41 %) 2012-06-01
himik49 91013 136 (0.31 %)1 871 (0.23 %)253 (0.76 %) 2011-12-15
Z440236 12912 728 (0.27 %)2 213 (0.27 %)103 (0.31 %) 2012-01-25
JesperFj258 87812 616 (0.26 %)2 006 (0.24 %)122 (0.36 %) 2010-06-08
DeKaN471 97212 376 (0.23 %)1 841 (0.22 %)91 (0.27 %)4 (0.31 %)2012-01-25
Andre Engels4 05412 191 (0.21 %)1 916 (0.23 %)55 (0.16 %) 2011-08-04
PeterIto4 95112 134 (0.21 %)2 134 (0.26 %)  2009-01-03
lenux563 35712 067 (0.20 %)1 197 (0.14 %)174 (0.52 %) 2012-01-26
garl51 19611 996 (0.20 %)1 361 (0.16 %)127 (0.38 %) 2012-01-25
Scondo421 52411 833 (0.18 %)908 (0.11 %)185 (0.55 %) 2012-01-28
GoldenEyeOSM241 69011 785 (0.18 %)535 (0.06 %)250 (0.75 %) 2010-08-24
OldIvantey314 21111 673 (0.16 %)1 248 (0.15 %)85 (0.25 %) 2012-04-06
Scaurr0ck351 27511 671 (0.16 %)1 536 (0.19 %)23 (0.07 %)1 (0.08 %)2012-03-13
lexx78no338 03811 397 (0.14 %)1 362 (0.16 %)7 (0.02 %) 2010-08-27
griigoriok504 98011 385 (0.14 %)240 (0.03 %)229 (0.68 %) 2011-08-15
JonnAngelo509 15711 352 (0.13 %)177 (0.02 %)235 (0.70 %) 2012-06-03
Upliner67 66811 342 (0.13 %)1 262 (0.15 %)16 (0.05 %) 2009-10-30
RSergei432 50911 301 (0.13 %)391 (0.05 %)54 (0.16 %)32 (2.52 %)2012-06-16
xmav475 21411 204 (0.12 %)584 (0.07 %)124 (0.37 %) 2012-04-20
trolleway397 32611 186 (0.12 %)996 (0.12 %)26 (0.08 %)3 (0.24 %)2012-01-24
AlRight177 08411 063 (0.10 %)948 (0.11 %)15 (0.04 %)2 (0.16 %)2011-05-15
pgalex414 09611 046 (0.10 %)906 (0.11 %)28 (0.08 %) 2011-09-11
df235369 64911 034 (0.10 %)804 (0.10 %)46 (0.14 %) 2012-01-26
Baton89682 38511 029 (0.10 %)479 (0.06 %)110 (0.33 %) 2012-06-05
W  H  S
23 543-11 006 (0.10 %)896 (0.11 %)22 (0.07 %) 2011-06-08
bvg777665 1691955 (0.09 %)335 (0.04 %)124 (0.37 %) 2012-06-19
Silver87310 6351845 (0.08 %)675 (0.08 %)30 (0.09 %)1 (0.08 %)2012-02-18
W  H  S
212 1680808 (0.08 %)808 (0.10 %)  2010-01-10
luch86266 0921760 (0.07 %)  38 (2.99 %)2012-05-13
Ilis127 1701754 (0.07 %)734 (0.09 %)4 (0.01 %) 2010-11-09
Felis Pimeja260 7561736 (0.07 %)591 (0.07 %)9 (0.03 %)5 (0.39 %)2012-01-12
tsvnv137 5701670 (0.07 %)665 (0.08 %)1 (0.00 %) 2011-06-11
Alexandr Zeinalov161 4761640 (0.06 %)  32 (2.52 %)2011-10-28
Max Vasilev18 7761521 (0.05 %)26 (0.00 %)99 (0.30 %) 2012-02-29
bp0106204 5961420 (0.04 %)  21 (1.65 %)2012-05-13

¹) Rank is usually sorted by OSM merit⁴. You can click on the other values in the head of the table to sort it by nodes, ways etc.
²) Username with link to OSM user page, “W” links to wiki page of the user, “H” links to “How Did You Contribute” where you can find the most present state of licence acceptance, “S” links to search for discussions on ODbL related topic.
³) “1” means user has accepted ODbL and CT. “-1” means user does not like ODbL or CT. “0” means no decision yet ⇒ user should be informed. If you want to accept the new licence (ODbL) and Contributor Terms (CT) you can go here.
⁴) OSM merit is an artificial value which is calculated as follows by objects where the user was last editor: OSM merit = nodes × 1 + ways × 5 + relations × 20.
⁵) User was last editor of data.

This list was limited to users with at least 500 nodes, 65 ways or 10 relations.

Valid HTML 4.01 Strict CSS is valid!