OpenStreetMap ODbL acceptance and user ranks for the region of Туркмения

If you want to ask a user about the ODbL:
  1. First check if the user hasn’t accepted already by clicking on the „H“ next to the username on this page (because this stats are only updated once a week) and if nobody else has bothered the user before (see the list in the wiki)
  2. check the OSM user page (click on the username on this page) and the wiki page of the user (click on the “W” next to the username on this page)
  3. do a web search on discussions of the user about the ODbL (click on the “S” next to the username on this page)
Please write a friendly mail, asking if the user already knows about the licence change, where he could read more about the topic and how he could accept the licence.

Created on: 2012-06-21, archive: 2012-05-15, 2012-03-28, 2012-03-15, 2012-02-29, 2012-02-14, 2012-01-30, 2012-01-16, 2011-12-28, 2011-12-15, 2011-11-23, 2011-11-09, 2011-10-25, 2011-10-13, 2011-09-27, 2011-09-13, 2011-09-06, 2011-08-30, 2011-08-23, 2011-08-16, 2011-08-10, 2011-07-27

Nodes
 ODbLCCODbL + CC
v1121 231 (91.73 %)118 (0.09 %)121 349 (91.82 %)
last edit10 810 (8.18 %)1 (0.00 %)10 811 (8.18 %)
v1 + last edit132 041 (99.91 %)119 (0.09 %)132 160 (100.00 %)
 
Ways
 ODbLCCODbL + CC
v15 881 (75.62 %)3 (0.04 %)5 884 (75.66 %)
last edit1 891 (24.32 %)2 (0.03 %)1 893 (24.34 %)
v1 + last edit7 772 (99.94 %)5 (0.06 %)7 777 (100.00 %)
 
Relations
 ODbLCCODbL + CC
v132 (47.06 %) (0.00 %)32 (47.06 %)
last edit36 (52.94 %)0 (0.00 %)36 (52.94 %)
v1 + last edit68 (100.00 %)0 (0.00 %)68 (100.00 %)
 
Contributors
 109 (96.46 %)4 (3.54 %)113 (100.00 %)
Legend
X  
   
Y Z

The new ODbL database will contain at least X and at most Y objects of present state (if the database change would be today). At the moment the database contains a total of Z objects.

 

Rank¹
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
 
User²uidODbL³OSM merit⁴nodes⁵ways⁵relations⁵last edit
Total user/data ODbL acceptance rate (at last edit!):96.46% 99.91%99.94%100.00% 
woodpeck5 164175 643 (43.88 %)60 958 (46.12 %)2 897 (37.25 %)10 (14.71 %)2012-03-24
miros mari399 714122 345 (12.96 %)14 785 (11.19 %)1 512 (19.44 %) 2012-02-02
katpatuka17 497112 294 (7.13 %)11 784 (8.92 %)94 (1.21 %)2 (2.94 %)2012-06-01
kto135 290112 105 (7.02 %)10 150 (7.68 %)391 (5.03 %) 2011-04-29
kesler13 908110 868 (6.30 %)6 748 (5.11 %)812 (10.44 %)3 (4.41 %)2012-06-13
aighes110 63915 196 (3.01 %)4 391 (3.32 %)161 (2.07 %) 2012-06-10
HBR64 80514 910 (2.85 %)4 145 (3.14 %)153 (1.97 %) 2011-08-07
Claudius Henrichs18 06914 748 (2.75 %)3 493 (2.64 %)247 (3.18 %)1 (1.47 %)2012-03-16
Marych73349 64514 410 (2.56 %)2 405 (1.82 %)309 (3.97 %)23 (33.82 %)2012-06-19
afgroadsimport351 57413 481 (2.02 %)3 151 (2.38 %)66 (0.85 %) 2010-10-02
jamesks2 50012 271 (1.32 %)2 271 (1.72 %)  2008-09-26
ird2011396 44112 009 (1.17 %)1 119 (0.85 %)178 (2.29 %) 2011-01-19
glebius94 78611 679 (0.97 %)664 (0.50 %)187 (2.40 %)4 (5.88 %)2011-05-15
Garpul294 22411 418 (0.82 %)648 (0.49 %)154 (1.98 %) 2012-02-14
malenki39 5041982 (0.57 %)867 (0.66 %)15 (0.19 %)2 (2.94 %)2009-06-16
dieterdreist26 1391940 (0.55 %)565 (0.43 %)75 (0.96 %) 2012-01-27
Komяpa29 3201335 (0.19 %) 67 (0.86 %) 2011-10-13

¹) Rank is usually sorted by OSM merit⁴. You can click on the other values in the head of the table to sort it by nodes, ways etc.
²) Username with link to OSM user page, “W” links to wiki page of the user, “H” links to “How Did You Contribute” where you can find the most present state of licence acceptance, “S” links to search for discussions on ODbL related topic.
³) “1” means user has accepted ODbL and CT. “-1” means user does not like ODbL or CT. “0” means no decision yet ⇒ user should be informed. If you want to accept the new licence (ODbL) and Contributor Terms (CT) you can go here.
⁴) OSM merit is an artificial value which is calculated as follows by objects where the user was last editor: OSM merit = nodes × 1 + ways × 5 + relations × 20.
⁵) User was last editor of data.

This list was limited to users with at least 500 nodes, 65 ways or 10 relations.

Valid HTML 4.01 Strict CSS is valid!